THE recent publication of Indonesia’s national economic data for the second quarter of 2025 by Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) or the Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics has raised significant concerns regarding the transparency, accuracy, and independence of statistical practices in Indonesia.
This essay will explore the importance of accurate economic data, the concerns with Indonesia’s economic data, and the need for transparency and accuracy in statistical practices.
Accurate economic data is crucial for informed decision-making, policy development, and economic stability. GDP is a key indicator of a country’s economic performance, and its accuracy is essential for understanding the state of the economy.
Inaccurate or inconsistent data can lead to misguided policy decisions, affecting the country’s economic development and growth. For instance, if the data suggests a higher growth rate than actual, policymakers may implement policies that exacerbate inflation or create asset bubbles.
The reported 5.12% year-on-year GDP or economic growth rate for the second quarter of 2025 has raised questions about the accuracy and transparency of statistical practices. The construction sector, driven by infrastructure projects, and strong domestic consumption were key contributors to the growth.
However, regional data shows significant disparities, with North Maluku recording the highest growth rate at 32.09%, while Central Papua experienced a decline of -9.83%. These disparities raise questions about the accuracy of the data and the methodologies used to calculate GDP.
The integrity of national economic data is essential for maintaining investor confidence and promoting economic stability. Transparency and accuracy in statistical practices are crucial for building trust and credibility. BPS, as the national statistics agency, has a critical role in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of economic data.
To achieve this, BPS should prioritize transparency in its statistical practices, providing detailed explanations of methodologies used in calculating GDP and other economic indicators.
There are several recommendations that can be addressed, among others things:
- BPS Should Provide Detailed Explanations:
BPS should provide detailed explanations for the methodologies used in calculating GDP and address concerns about data inconsistencies. - Increased Transparency:
BPS should increase transparency in its statistical practices to build trust and credibility. - Independent Review:
An independent review of BPS’s statistical practices and methodologies could help identify areas for improvement. - Capacity Building:
BPS should invest in capacity building, including training and technical assistance, to enhance the skills and knowledge of its staff.
In order to promote transparency and accuracy in statistical practices, BPS should prioritize the following:
a. Methodological Transparency.
b. Data Quality.
c. Independent Oversight.
d. Stakeholders Engagement.
